Planning, procurement and delivery decisions for maintainable digital products.
A practical framework for planning a website that supports real business journeys, launches cleanly and remains understandable after handover.
Read the full article3 in-depth articles in this collection.
A scope-first guide to budgeting a US law firm website without pretending one price fits every practice, content library or intake workflow.
Read article
A practical framework for choosing a software delivery model and evaluating partners by operating fit rather than ‘top company’ lists or unsupported savings claims.
Read articleClear answers to common research and decision questions within this topic.
It should connect business outcomes and user needs to a prioritized product boundary, evidence plan, technology constraints, delivery stages and ownership model. A strategy is useful when it removes uncertainty and guides trade-offs, not when it is only a list of desired features.
Map priority audiences to the decisions and actions the website must support, then define content, functionality and measurement around those journeys. This keeps design and SEO choices tied to enquiries, sales, self-service, recruitment or another accountable outcome.
Evaluate relevant problem-solving evidence, technical judgment, communication, security and QA practices, scope transparency, deployment responsibility and handover. Ask how the partner handles uncertainty and exclusions; polished proposals matter less than a credible method for making and validating decisions.
Incremental modernization is safer when valuable data, URLs, integrations or operating workflows must remain available and the current system can be separated into replaceable boundaries. A full rebuild is justified when foundational constraints cannot be isolated, but it still needs migration evidence, parallel validation and rollback planning.
Buy when a supported product meets the differentiating requirements with acceptable integration and ownership costs; build when the workflow or capability is strategically distinct and packaged constraints create material risk. Compare total lifecycle cost, data portability, extensibility, vendor dependence, security and exit options—not license price alone.
